Esophageal Dilation

Introduction


Esophageal dilation is a therapeutic procedure used to widen narrowed sections of the esophagus, improving a patient’s ability to swallow. This mechanical intervention is commonly performed to treat various conditions causing esophageal strictures, including gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), eosinophilic esophagitis, and post-surgical scarring.

The success of esophageal dilation depends heavily on proper patient evaluation, appropriate technique selection, and careful consideration of potential risks and contraindications. This comprehensive guide outlines the essential aspects of esophageal dilation, from pre-procedure evaluation to post-procedure management.

Evaluation Prior to Esophageal Dilation


Barium Studies

  • General Use: Not typically required before endoscopy in suspected esophageal stricture cases.
  • Specific Cases: Recommended for complex strictures, such as those from radiation therapy or caustic ingestion.
  • Goals: Identify stricture location, length, number, esophageal lumen diameter, and any associated pathology.
  • Purpose: Helps in selecting dilating techniques, estimating session numbers, and informing patients about risks.

Endoscopy

  • Role in Malignancy: Necessary for diagnosis if barium studies suggest malignancy.
  • Typical Procedure: Often performed along with dilation in the initial session.

Contraindications to Dilation

  • Acute Conditions: Avoid in acute or incompletely healed esophageal perforation.
  • Malignancy Concerns: Postpone if the stricture might be malignant, until confirmed benign.
  • Comorbid Illnesses: Consider risks in patients with bleeding disorders or severe pulmonary/cardiovascular disease.
  • Special Cases: Use caution in patients with pharyngeal or cervical deformities, recent surgery, large thoracic aneurysms, or impacted food bolus.
  • Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Extreme care needed due to higher perforation risk.

Types of Esophageal Dilators


Mechanical Dilators

  • Categories: Push-type (Bougie) and balloon dilators.
  • Mechanism: Increase esophageal lumen size through stretching or splitting.
  • Types:
    • Freely Passed Dilators: Maloney (common, tapered tip, multiple sizes, mercury or tungsten-filled), Hurst (rounded tip, less common).
    • Guidewire-Assisted Dilators: Savary-Gilliard (plastic, tapered, multiple sizes), American Dilatation System, Eder-Puestow olive dilators (metal, less used).
    • Flexible Bougie: Transparent, over endoscope, allows sequential dilation.

Balloon Dilators

  • Types: Through-the-scope (TTS) and over-the-guidewire (OTW).
  • Features: Greater radial force, retain maximum diameter predictably.
  • Sizes: Initially in 2 mm increments, newer TTS balloons expand to three diameters at 1.0 to 1.5 mm increments.

Therapeutic Approach to Esophageal Stricture


Approach Based on Stricture Characteristics

  • Dependency: Treatment varies depending on the stricture’s nature and the endoscopist’s experience.
  • Simple vs. Complex: Simple strictures differ significantly from complex ones in terms of management.

Treatment of Simple Strictures

  • Characteristics: Typically associated with prolonged reflux esophagitis, they are smooth, short, straight, and located in the distal esophagus.
  • Diameter Consideration: Can be traversed with an endoscope (>10 mm in diameter).
  • Dilation Techniques: Use of Maloney dilators, balloon dilators, or mechanical dilators passed over a guidewire, based on preference.

Treatment of Complex Strictures

  • Nature: Long, narrow, tortuous, or associated with other complications like hiatal hernias or diverticula.
  • Risk Mitigation: Use of a guidewire-based system or a balloon dilator to prevent complications like esophageal perforation.
  • Combination Therapy: Initial dilation with guidewire or balloon dilators, followed by Maloney dilators for further sessions if feasible.

Special Considerations

  • Proximal Strictures: May require a barium swallow for detailed assessment. Treated with guidewire-based dilators, sometimes under fluoroscopic guidance.
  • Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE): Dilation as adjunctive therapy after medical treatment fails. Increased risk of tearing and perforation. Both mechanical and balloon dilators are used without a clear superiority. Aim for symptomatic relief with a maximum diameter of 13 to 14 mm.

Perforation Risk in EoE

  • Systematic Review Findings: Relative risk of perforation in EoE dilation is 0.1 percent, similar to other indications.

Dilation Technique


Procedure Overview

  • Setting: Performed as an ambulatory procedure using conscious sedation and topical pharyngeal anesthesia.
  • Patient Preparation: Fasting, avoidance of antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants, no longer requiring antibiotic prophylaxis.
  • Positioning: Left lateral decubitus position; seated position possible for Maloney dilators.
  • Initial Dilator Size: Based on the estimated stricture diameter.

Mechanical Dilation

  • Maloney Dilator: Passed blindly after endoscope removal. Assess for resistance and blood to gauge success.
  • Guidewire-Based Dilators: Passed over the guidewire; the guidewire is fed through the endoscope into the stomach.

Balloon Dilation (TTS)

  • Procedure: Passed through the endoscope channel, with inflation under direct visualization or fluoroscopy.
  • Observation: Fluoroscopic observation helps assure maximum diameter achievement.
  • Dilation Protocol: Typically two to three dilations per session, each lasting 30 to 60 seconds.

Number of Dilations Per Session

  • Guidelines: Limiting the number of dilations and incremental increases helps reduce adverse effects.
  • Bougie Dilators: No more than three dilators per session, increasing luminal stenosis by no more than 6 French.
  • Balloon Dilators: Limit to three incremental inflations.

Repeated Sessions

  • Frequency: Depends on initial success and patient response.
  • Shrinkage Consideration: Reassess stricture diameter as shrinkage is common.

Safety of Mucosal Biopsy Prior to Dilation

  • General Practice: Biopsies are typically performed after dilation, but doing them beforehand is likely safe.

Post-Dilation Acid Control


Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs)

  • Purpose: Decrease the risk of stricture recurrence post-dilation.
  • Effectiveness: PPIs are more effective than H2 antagonists in reducing the need for subsequent dilation in patients with peptic strictures.
  • Practice: Omeprazole 20 mg twice daily for one year is common, increasing to 40 mg if necessary.
  • Importance of Adequate Dilation: Even with PPI treatment, ensuring proper dilation is crucial.

Studies on PPIs

  • Example: In a study comparing omeprazole and ranitidine, omeprazole-treated patients required fewer repeated dilation sessions and had improved dysphagia scores.
  • Stricture Diameter and Esophagitis: Dysphagia in peptic strictures relates to both stricture diameter and presence of esophagitis.

Ambulatory pH Monitoring

  • Use: For patients with recurrent peptic strictures despite PPI use.
  • Purpose: To ensure adequate acid suppression.

Surgical Consideration

  • Indication: Young patients with peptic strictures frequently requiring dilation or dependent on PPIs.

Refractory Strictures


Challenges in Management

  • Issue: Patients not achieving symptom relief despite intensive dilation and reflux therapy.
  • Surgical Candidacy: Often poor candidates for surgery, yet successful antireflux surgery depends on adequate preoperative dilation.

Self-Dilation

  • Suitability: For motivated patients with simple strictures, though risks exist.

Endoscopic Techniques

  • Corticosteroid Injections: Commonly used but with unestablished efficacy.
  • Removable Esophageal Stents: Another option, though with mixed experiences and potential risks.

Studies on Corticosteroids and Stents

  • Corticosteroid Injections: Showed a reduction in repeat dilation need.
  • Nonmetal Stents: Mixed results, with potential complications like stent migration and pain.
  • Metal Stents: Not recommended for benign strictures due to complications.
×
Popup image